NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Vendor control mappingControl-language mapping for buyer review; not a certification.
Official referenceTrust Center
RelixQ active validation is limited to systems, applications, repositories, domains, cloud accounts, and infrastructure the customer owns or is explicitly authorized to assess.
Evidence posture
Product authorization records are available in customer scope; the public policy remains under legal and operational review.
Framework relationships
Control-language mapping for buyer review; not a certification.
Official referenceRelixQ artifacts can support an assessment; they do not certify the customer or provide a legal opinion.
Claim register
Each statement carries its own scope, evidence posture, framework relationship, and review date. Roadmap language remains visibly separate from achieved controls.
Published claim
The customer is responsible for obtaining written authorization from the system owner before active assessment. Public reachability, access, or possession of credentials does not by itself establish authority.
Evidence
Operational evidenceAuthorization is represented in the signed project Rules of Engagement.
Framework context
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Vendor control mapping — Control-language mapping for buyer review; not a certification.
Published claim
Every active run must define allowed targets and explicit exclusions. Exclusions take precedence, and validation must stop when a third-party or otherwise unauthorized boundary is detected.
Evidence
Operational evidenceThe product persists and evaluates scope before and during an active run.
Framework context
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Vendor control mapping — Control-language mapping for buyer review; not a certification.
Customer security and resilience programs
Customer evidence support — RelixQ artifacts can support an assessment; they do not certify the customer or provide a legal opinion.
Published claim
Active validation is intended for read-only protocol and posture observation. Destructive testing, persistence, denial of service, credential attacks, data extraction, and bypass of safety controls are prohibited.
Evidence
Operational evidenceSafety configuration and run events support review of the assessment boundary.
Framework context
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Vendor control mapping — Control-language mapping for buyer review; not a certification.
Published claim
Assessment evidence must be handled as confidential security information and retained only for the approved period. Final retention and deletion commitments remain governed by the applicable agreement and approved schedule.
Evidence
Gated evidenceCustomer assessment evidence is restricted and its final retention schedule remains under review.
Framework context
AICPA Trust Services Criteria / SOC 2
Assurance roadmap — Control mapping and examination roadmap only. RelixQ does not claim a completed SOC 2 examination.
ISO/IEC 27001
Assurance roadmap — Information-security management roadmap only. RelixQ does not claim ISO/IEC 27001 certification.
Publication boundary
This page is a public summary. Detailed evidence may still require controlled access, an NDA, or an active procurement review. The catalog entry was last reviewed on .